Email a copy of 'Chelsea Pitch Owners - EGM' to a friend
Loading ...
8 thoughts on “Chelsea Pitch Owners – EGM”
From this i suggest that the chelsea supporters group has little interest in seeing a blanced debate!!! There is not one group mentioned that is against sayno! If you can’t give a balanced report of what is going on you do not deserve my membership!
A balanced debate is exactly what the CSG is looking for, we can only offer links to opinions and articles that we know about. We welcome any other links that give all views on the CPO EGM and would be only too pleased to add these to the article shown. Thank you for your comments.
I believe that cfc truth (4th link down) is very much against SNCPO – have you had a look?
I did my best to find all angles but to be honest I could only really find the truth blog in that respect – if you can guide me towards any others, we will happily add them. Or indeed, even better if you would like to write something from your point of view, we’d be happy to put it up
The attitude of CSG can be deduced from looking at just two things P Bax
1)Their reaction to the original offer by the club to buy back the freehold when they were extremely active and eventually successful in the campaign that defeated the clubs bid
2)Their complete indifference to the news that Chelsea had put a bid in for the Battersea site, they merely posted a link to a couple of club announcements re the bid
Can you imagine any other fan group of any other club in that same situation virtually ignoring such a huge development in their clubs history with the possibility of moving to such an iconic location with a 60k stadium on offer?
The bid for BPS was, as it said, a bid!
M Blue, I can’t see where you are coming from here, what did you expect the CSG to do or, react.
Did any other Chelsea fan groups or websites react any different to us? no of course not because there was nothing to report or react to.
Please try and remember we are all Chelsea fans at heart and only want what is best for the club.
The bid for Battersea was unsuccessful – if it had been successful then I think the majority of us would have been delighted. I’m not sure what you expected? Some “what if” articles assuming that the bid was successful?
To be honest we would rather deal in certainties.
But our offer is open to you just as it is to anyone – write us a piece with your view & we would be happy to put it up
Thanks for putting all the links up although not sure it helps me much as it doesn’t look to me that CPO has moved on from where we were in October.
We still don’t have an identified site that we can make an informed decision on, there’s still next to nothing coming from the CPO board & it still doesn’t look as if the council is doing much to help us – back to square one!
Regarding the paying off the loan – I thought I read somewhere that as the loan is interest free – if CPO put the money they have already raised in a high interest account, by the time the money is due to be paid back we’d have enough?
From this i suggest that the chelsea supporters group has little interest in seeing a blanced debate!!! There is not one group mentioned that is against sayno! If you can’t give a balanced report of what is going on you do not deserve my membership!
A balanced debate is exactly what the CSG is looking for, we can only offer links to opinions and articles that we know about. We welcome any other links that give all views on the CPO EGM and would be only too pleased to add these to the article shown. Thank you for your comments.
I believe that cfc truth (4th link down) is very much against SNCPO – have you had a look?
I did my best to find all angles but to be honest I could only really find the truth blog in that respect – if you can guide me towards any others, we will happily add them. Or indeed, even better if you would like to write something from your point of view, we’d be happy to put it up
The attitude of CSG can be deduced from looking at just two things P Bax
1)Their reaction to the original offer by the club to buy back the freehold when they were extremely active and eventually successful in the campaign that defeated the clubs bid
2)Their complete indifference to the news that Chelsea had put a bid in for the Battersea site, they merely posted a link to a couple of club announcements re the bid
Can you imagine any other fan group of any other club in that same situation virtually ignoring such a huge development in their clubs history with the possibility of moving to such an iconic location with a 60k stadium on offer?
The bid for BPS was, as it said, a bid!
M Blue, I can’t see where you are coming from here, what did you expect the CSG to do or, react.
Did any other Chelsea fan groups or websites react any different to us? no of course not because there was nothing to report or react to.
Please try and remember we are all Chelsea fans at heart and only want what is best for the club.
The bid for Battersea was unsuccessful – if it had been successful then I think the majority of us would have been delighted. I’m not sure what you expected? Some “what if” articles assuming that the bid was successful?
To be honest we would rather deal in certainties.
But our offer is open to you just as it is to anyone – write us a piece with your view & we would be happy to put it up
Thanks for putting all the links up although not sure it helps me much as it doesn’t look to me that CPO has moved on from where we were in October.
We still don’t have an identified site that we can make an informed decision on, there’s still next to nothing coming from the CPO board & it still doesn’t look as if the council is doing much to help us – back to square one!
Regarding the paying off the loan – I thought I read somewhere that as the loan is interest free – if CPO put the money they have already raised in a high interest account, by the time the money is due to be paid back we’d have enough?